OpenVerdict performs structured public record synthesis, social signal analysis, and bias indicator mapping to support targeted voir dire preparation.
Built for trial teams preparing for high-stakes litigation.
Private beta. Limited onboarding.
Juror research lives in scattered searches.
Trial notes live in binders.
Strategy lives in someone's head.
But jury selection decisions happen in minutes.
Without structured intelligence drawn from verifiable public sources, critical signals are easy to miss.
OpenVerdict consolidates public record synthesis, bias indicator mapping, and voir dire preparation into one documented, source-linked system built for trial teams.
Each juror dossier documents:
All indicators are traceable to underlying public sources.
OpenVerdict surfaces structured indicators drawn from public sources. Each signal links to evidence — interpretation stays with the attorney.
Sample profile · illustrative data only
Juror Profile
Juror #7 — M. Thompson
Military service (public records) · law enforcement family (social media)
Mid-level management (LinkedIn) · 12 yrs Fortune 500 (employment records)
No bankruptcy filings (court records) · homeowner (property records)
Volunteer history (org records) · community board member (municipal filings)
Signals are derived from public records and do not constitute legal advice. All indicators link to source documentation.
A strategic seat map surfaces signal density across the full panel — helping trial teams prioritize voir dire focus areas.
Jury Panel
Case #2024-CV-4871 — 12 Seated Jurors
Back Row
#1
R. Castillo
#2
M. Thompson
#3
J. Whitfield
#4
A. Pham
#5
D. Moreno
#6
K. Johansson
Front Row
#7
T. Williams
#8
S. Nakamura
#9
L. Brennan
#10
C. Okafor
#11
P. Reeves
#12
H. Delgado
Sample panel · illustrative data only. Signal indicators are derived from public records and do not constitute legal assessments.
Five integrated modules for structured voir dire preparation and juror analysis.
Structured public record synthesis producing clear, documented juror profiles from verified data sources.
Identifies experiential and attitudinal indicators — institutional trust, corporate sentiment, authority orientation — relevant to case themes.
Produces targeted, case-specific questioning frameworks with follow-up lines of inquiry and areas for further exploration.
Aggregates publicly available records, professional history, and online presence into structured, reviewable profiles.
Every indicator links to its underlying public source. No proprietary scoring. Full transparency for attorney review.
Plaintiff litigation firms
Defense trial teams
Complex civil litigation
Criminal defense trials
Any case where jury composition can determine the outcome.
Juror Intelligence Engine
Bias Signal Mapping
Voir Dire Assistant
Trial Testimony Analysis
Strategy Reporting
One platform for structured trial preparation.
Bring structured juror intelligence into your next trial.
Private beta. Limited onboarding.